Completed on 8 Jul 2016 by Richard Malham . Sourced from http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/07/05/062109.
Login to endorse this review.
I already noted these in a comment on this blog post (http://blogs.plos.org/plos/201... but wanted to also raise them here
Stephen: When revising the article, I would suggest looking at the existing recommendations in these two reports (particularly relevant to the recommendations section at the end of the Discussion section)
‘Evaluating Interdisciplinary Research: a practical guide’, from Durham University’s Institute of Advanced Study (July 2015)
‘Improving recognition of team science contributions in biomedical
research careers’, from the Academy of Medical Sciences (March 2016)